<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ANB park website redone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://behind.aotw.org/2006/08/25/anb-park-website-redone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://behind.aotw.org/2006/08/25/anb-park-website-redone/</link>
	<description>the backwash of a digital history project</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:32:16 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Downey</title>
		<link>http://behind.aotw.org/2006/08/25/anb-park-website-redone/comment-page-1/#comment-2101</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Downey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 14:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aotw.org/blog/2006/08/25/anb-park-website-redone/#comment-2101</guid>
		<description>Hi Scott,

Thanks for stopping in.  

You&#039;re just touching the tip of the iceberg here, and make an excellent point--specific to mapping and GIS, but also more generally.  There is vast potential for presenting information about the battle and the Park online. The tools are there.

I don&#039;t know that the Park has the staff resources, however.  Or the mission, particularly.

For the moment, I&#039;m guessing this kind of project will be up to &lt;a href=&quot;http://aotw.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;AotW&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.virtualantietam.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Virtual Antietam&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.westwoodgalleries.com/antietam/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Photographic Tour&lt;/a&gt;, and/or other ambitious individuals, consortia, or teams (to be named later). 

In the current case, it does not appear that the Park Service meant this new web look to be a clean-slate redesign.  There are some new items, but this is largely old wine in a new, easier opening bottle.

How about you?  It sounds like you know something about the subject - how about getting busy?   :)

BD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Scott,</p>
<p>Thanks for stopping in.  </p>
<p>You&#8217;re just touching the tip of the iceberg here, and make an excellent point&#8211;specific to mapping and GIS, but also more generally.  There is vast potential for presenting information about the battle and the Park online. The tools are there.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know that the Park has the staff resources, however.  Or the mission, particularly.</p>
<p>For the moment, I&#8217;m guessing this kind of project will be up to <a href="http://aotw.org" rel="nofollow">AotW</a>, <a href="http://www.virtualantietam.com/" rel="nofollow">Virtual Antietam</a>, <a href="http://www.westwoodgalleries.com/antietam/" rel="nofollow">Photographic Tour</a>, and/or other ambitious individuals, consortia, or teams (to be named later). </p>
<p>In the current case, it does not appear that the Park Service meant this new web look to be a clean-slate redesign.  There are some new items, but this is largely old wine in a new, easier opening bottle.</p>
<p>How about you?  It sounds like you know something about the subject &#8211; how about getting busy?   :)</p>
<p>BD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott s.</title>
		<link>http://behind.aotw.org/2006/08/25/anb-park-website-redone/comment-page-1/#comment-2099</link>
		<dc:creator>scott s.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 23:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aotw.org/blog/2006/08/25/anb-park-website-redone/#comment-2099</guid>
		<description>IMHO they missed the boat on their map resources.  The monuments are provided only in a pdf.  Otherwise all I could find were jpg images of maps.

Would be nice to have a shapefile with the monuments.  I assume they have, or could easily get, accurate GPS coordinates for all of them.  NPS could work something out with USGS I would hope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMHO they missed the boat on their map resources.  The monuments are provided only in a pdf.  Otherwise all I could find were jpg images of maps.</p>
<p>Would be nice to have a shapefile with the monuments.  I assume they have, or could easily get, accurate GPS coordinates for all of them.  NPS could work something out with USGS I would hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

