Comments on: James Madison Cutts of Washington, DC http://behind.aotw.org/2006/11/17/james-madison-cutts-of-washington-dc/ the backwash of a digital history project Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:32:16 -0700 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Brian http://behind.aotw.org/2006/11/17/james-madison-cutts-of-washington-dc/comment-page-1/#comment-6281 Brian Fri, 25 May 2007 16:14:04 +0000 http://behind.aotw.org/2006/11/17/james-madison-cutts-of-washington-dc/#comment-6281 Hi Bing,

Thanks very much for weighing in – certainly no disrespect shown or felt! My disagreement with “Triple MoH’ is largely semantic, not deeply substantive.?Ǭ† Also, I doubt my one-pager can be compared to your years of work …

]]> By: Bing Spitler http://behind.aotw.org/2006/11/17/james-madison-cutts-of-washington-dc/comment-page-1/#comment-6280 Bing Spitler Fri, 25 May 2007 15:18:08 +0000 http://behind.aotw.org/2006/11/17/james-madison-cutts-of-washington-dc/#comment-6280 Brian: I liked your write up regarding James Madison Cutts. You wrote in one page what it took me 7 years to research. I know the title is somewhat controversial; however, the notation "Triple Medal of Honor," is listed in the Congressional Records and Carl Sandburg used it in his description of the Lincoln Reprimand, pg 581-582, Abraham Lincoln: The Prairie Years and The War Years. No disrespect intended but I stand with Sandburg. Bing Spitler Brian:
I liked your write up regarding James Madison Cutts. You wrote in one page what it took me 7 years to research. I know the title is somewhat controversial; however, the notation “Triple Medal of Honor,” is listed in the Congressional Records and Carl Sandburg used it in his description of the Lincoln Reprimand, pg 581-582, Abraham Lincoln: The Prairie Years and The War Years. No disrespect intended but I stand with Sandburg. Bing Spitler

]]>