<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Building on a CMS 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://behind.aotw.org/2007/02/14/building-on-a-cms-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://behind.aotw.org/2007/02/14/building-on-a-cms-2/</link>
	<description>the backwash of a digital history project</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:32:16 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://behind.aotw.org/2007/02/14/building-on-a-cms-2/comment-page-1/#comment-6446</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 03:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behind.aotw.org/2007/02/14/building-on-a-cms-2/#comment-6446</guid>
		<description>Hi Brian

Thanks for the wonderful article.. Hmm why dont you try Modx at http://modxcms.com/ its got lots of customization and there isn&#039;t much of a learning curve....heck its not called a CMS but a CMF (content management framework). Try it out sometime !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Brian</p>
<p>Thanks for the wonderful article.. Hmm why dont you try Modx at <a href="http://modxcms.com/" rel="nofollow">http://modxcms.com/</a> its got lots of customization and there isn&#8217;t much of a learning curve&#8230;.heck its not called a CMS but a CMF (content management framework). Try it out sometime !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://behind.aotw.org/2007/02/14/building-on-a-cms-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5385</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 02:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behind.aotw.org/2007/02/14/building-on-a-cms-2/#comment-5385</guid>
		<description>Thanks very much for popping by, Jenny.  Your thoughts of WP confirm my leaning that way. I&#039;m with you about our old websites, also.  It would have been a lot less work (but less fun, prob) had WP been around when we began.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks very much for popping by, Jenny.  Your thoughts of WP confirm my leaning that way. I&#8217;m with you about our old websites, also.  It would have been a lot less work (but less fun, prob) had WP been around when we began.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny</title>
		<link>http://behind.aotw.org/2007/02/14/building-on-a-cms-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5384</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 21:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behind.aotw.org/2007/02/14/building-on-a-cms-2/#comment-5384</guid>
		<description>I always figured if I ever decided to use a content management system on my behemoth of a website (I wish I had built it with one to begin with but that&#039;s now water under the bridge ...), I would use Word Press.  All of the plug-ins, the amount of documentation available, and the ease of use make WordPress a good choice, I think. 

As far as customization goes, so many people work on and with Wordpress that it also seems more likely you can find some existing code and then just be able to tweak it rather than having to write something totally from scratch. 

Good luck Brian!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always figured if I ever decided to use a content management system on my behemoth of a website (I wish I had built it with one to begin with but that&#8217;s now water under the bridge &#8230;), I would use Word Press.  All of the plug-ins, the amount of documentation available, and the ease of use make WordPress a good choice, I think. </p>
<p>As far as customization goes, so many people work on and with WordPress that it also seems more likely you can find some existing code and then just be able to tweak it rather than having to write something totally from scratch. </p>
<p>Good luck Brian!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

